
According to the about to be published memoirs of Alan Greenspan, the former head of the US Federal Reserve,
has admitted that going into Iraq was largely about oil:
"I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil."
Not exactly earth shattering news is it? Indeed, the response has been met by an equal shrug of the shoulders from most. Such is the apathy surrounding modern politics and the decision to invade Iraq that if a poll was conducted today whereby the ordinary person was asked the reason why there was an invasion most would probably answer with one word. Oil.
The original claims from both UK's Prime Minister at the time, Tony Blair, and the US President, George Bush, was that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
Bush in his address as the troops began their attack said:
"And our mission is clear, to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people."
Blair himself told the Houses of Commons that
"[The September Dossier] concludes that Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, that Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes"
The fact that these weapons have never been found, let alone having the capabilties of reaching the UK shores within 45minutes, is itself damning but more importantly become almost accepted as an undeniable truth amongst the masses.
The added criteria that Saddam Hussein was bad man and that he need to be removed on humanitarian grounds was also emotive. Most people would agree that Saddam was a despicable individual, but it was up to the people of Iraq to remove him. Most would also agree that those that sought his removal were complicit in his ascension to the role of Iraq's leader. The fact is that there are several despotic rulers around the world, yet most are allowed to continue their reigns of terror was also not lost on the vast majority. Indeed, it only adds to the weightier claims made by Greenspan.
Despite the denials the fact that the proposed Iraqi Oil Law will allow:
- Two-thirds of Iraq's oil fields to be developed by private oil corporations.
- Place governing decisions over oil in a new body known as the Iraqi Federal Oil and Gas Council, which may include foreign oil companies
more or less means that Iraq's oil could be controlled by US and UK influences.
The sad fact is that Greenspan says nothing that we do not know already.